How Accurate is Google Analytics? The Average Level of GA4 Inaccuracy. [New Research]

By Andy Crestodina

Every number in your Google Analytics account is wrong.

Maybe the reasons are obvious. Some visitors block tracking codes. Some don’t accept cookies. Some browse in private mode. We all have the right to not be tracked.

Maybe it’s not a big deal. You don’t need perfect data to find insights. The specific numbers aren’t that important. There are still plenty of useful insights in every GA4 account.

But how inaccurate is Google Analytics?

It’s still an interesting and important question for digital marketers. Today we are answering that question. We’ll show our approach for measuring how inaccurate GA4 is. We’ll also show you how to check this for yourself in your own account.

Spoiler alert:

  • GA4 underreports traffic by 11% for sites without cookie consent banner
  • GA4 underreports traffic by 20% for sites with cookie consent banners

Please accept statistics, marketing cookies to watch this video.

Why is GA4 inaccurate?

Because there are so many ways to avoid being tracked.

Google Analytics records data when a little bit of Javascript (gtag.js) talks to cookies on the visitors device (_ga, _gid, etc.). If this little conversation doesn’t happen, no data is recorded in GA4. There are many reasons for this. The big ones are related to privacy and the trend toward Do Not Track (DNT).

  1. Ad blockers
  2. Do not allow cookies (through a consent banner)
  3. Browser privacy settings (and incognito mode)
  4. Cookies disabled (browser-level)
  5. Firewall restrictions (within corporate networks)

There are several other reasons (could be GA4 setup problems!) but these are the big ones. So GA4 underreports all traffic and conversions, but there are other ways to record activity on your website…

How can you measure the accuracy of GA4?

You compare Google Analytics to other sources of truth.

Even if the visitor uses an ad blocker or doesn’t accept cookies, they may still submit a contact form, subscribe to a newsletter, buy a product, make a donation, apply for a job, etc.

So the databases that record these actions are a better sources of truth. They are in the records in your systems. They are in your CMS (WordPress) or marketing automation tools (Hubspot), the leads in your CRM (Zoho), the sales in your ecommerce system (Shopify), etc.

Comparing the recorded conversions with the “key events” in GA4 shows us how much GA4 is underreporting.

You can do this for yourself very easily. Just pick a nice long date range in both tools and compare the data. If Hubspot shows 100 leads and GA4 shows 85, then GA4 is underreporting 15% of leads.

We did this 60 times, comparing various recorded conversions across 33 accounts, comparing newsletter signups, get-a-demo requests, ecommerce revenue and many other interactions in many other databases and in GA4.

We also compared our own GA4 traffic (not just key events) with traffic from Plausible, a cookieless analytics tool. We’ll show you that comparison below.

We measured the inaccuracy of Google Analytics for accounts for sites with and without cookie consent banners. Sites that use a consent management platform (CMP) such as Cookiebot give the visitor the option to accept cookies. When visitors are given the option, some visitors choose not to be tracked, so those accounts have slightly less accurate data.

Here are the average levels of underreporting by Google Analytics.

  • 11.2% of data is missing from websites that don’t use a cookie consent banner.
  • 20.3% of data is missing from websites that use a cookie consent banner.

Bar chart showing the difference in Google Analytics' recorded conversions for sites with and without cookie consent banners. Sites without cookie banners show 11.2% data missing, while sites with show 20.3%.

Looking more closely at the data, we see that the level of underreporting varies widely across accounts.

Here you can see the number of comparisons in each percentage range for sites without consent banners. Although the average was 11%, sometimes the data was off by just 1%, while others were off by 30%.

A bar graph showing the range of GA4 underreporting percentages across 20 GA4 accounts, highlighting an average underreporting level of 11%.

We separated the accounts that use a cookie consent banner from those that do not. Let’s look closer at the impact of all of those “Accept Cookie” buttons.

How do cookie consent banners affect GA4 accuracy?

It’s courteous to let people opt-out of tracking.
It’s also good to comply with privacy laws.

The two biggies are the European Union’s GDPR law (General Data Protection Regular) and California’s CCPA law (California Consumer Privacy Act). To comply with these, website owners need to use a CMP (Consent Management Platform) which puts a cookie consent banner at the bottom of the website, at least for visitors in EU countries and California.

The Orbit Media site uses a cookie consent banner for visitors from those places. So we’re able to compare those users to other users to estimate the impact cookie consent banners have on GA4’s accuracy.

Here we’ll use another method to measure the difference. It’s more accurate, but uses a smaller dataset. We’ll compare traffic recorded in Orbit Media’s GA4 to traffic recorded in Plausible. Plausible is a cookie-less and GDPR-compliant analytics tool. It tracks traffic using only Javascript. No cookies (or consent) necessary.

In both GA4 and Plausible, we separated the traffic from places where the banner was shown (for us, that’s California and European users) with traffic from places where the banner wasn’t shown. It was a tedious process but it revealed the recorded traffic impact of the cookie consent banner.

  • 15.8% of traffic data is missing when users were not shown the consent banner.
  • 55.6% of traffic data is missing when users were shown the consent banner.

Bar chart comparing traffic recorded in GA4 with and without cookie consent banners. Cookie consent banners result in a significant data loss, with 55.6% for shown users and 15.8% overall.

Note: This is different from the data above because although those websites use consent banners, they may not show it to all users. Here we are looking specifically at users who did and did not see the banner.

Remember, cookie consent banners do not affect your traffic. They only affect your recorded traffic. And 45% of your traffic data is plenty to get valuable insights. A true GA4 pro can come up with great hypotheses and make informed decisions while looking at small datasets. Of course, accounts with very low data have other issues. Those GA4 reports are sometimes filled with internal traffic.

Keep in mind, this analysis above is all from one GA4 property with a dataset of around 115K users. The impact of the consent banners varies widely on three big factors.

  1. Who sees the banner
    Is it shown to everyone? Just Europe? Europe and California? What about Canada? I’m not a lawyer, but the GDPR law states that any website with any visitors from an EU-member nation is subject to their laws. That’s every website. Ask a lawyer and they’ll recommend the most cautious, compliant approach. Banners for everyone!
  2. The banner size, UX and text
    Consent management platforms give you options for the style and settings in their banners. They can be simple and subtle or large and intense.
  3. Explicit vs. Implied consent
    This determines when the consent banner tells the Google Tag Manager to trigger all the marketing tags, if you have it set up properly. Explicit consent means the visitor has to click “Accept.” Implied consent means the visitor ignored the banner but scrolled or clicked on something.

Of course, implied consent will allow you to gather more Analytics data, but it is not GDPR compliant. Here’s what the most permission settings look like:

Screenshot of a website settings page showing banner options and a highlighted note stating that Implied Consent settings enable GA4 tracking even without user acceptance.

Our friend and GA4 expert has some tips for better data quality and tracking issues. She has been explaining marketing analytics inaccuracies for years.


A person with short hair and glasses smiles in front of a brick wall, wearing a gray shirt over a black T-shirt.
Dana DiTomaso, Kickpoint Playbook GA4 Courses

Don’t try for 100% accuracy in GA4 – it isn’t possible. Instead, make sure that the data that you do have is of good quality. Some tips:

  • Make sure to be consistent with your UTM tagging, and always use lowercase letters in your UTM parameters since GA4 is case-sensitive. Don’t split your traffic up because you used “Facebook” and your colleague used “facebook.”
  • Go to Admin > Data Retention and set the Event Data Retention to 14 months. By default it’s set to 2 months which limits the amount of data you can use in your Explorations. This isn’t really a data quality fix, it’s a quality of life fix.
  • Make sure that you aren’t double-counting data because your GA4 tracking code is added more than once. Go to Admin > Data Streams > click on your web data stream > Configure Tag Settings > Admin (at the top) > Manage Google Tag. If “Ignore duplicate instances of on-page configuration” is off, turn it on. But first make sure you aren’t already double-counting traffic. Otherwise your colleagues may see a reduction of traffic in your GA4 and not know why.”

Now you know the average level underreporting for all GA4 data. That’s conversion tracking gaps, inaccurate real time data and missing transactions, regardless of the traffic source and attribution model. Keep in mind that metrics showing percentages (bounce rates, engagement rates, conversion paths, key event rates) should be more accurate, regardless of privacy tools and user behavior.

The future of the web: more privacy and less data

It’s safe to predict that more privacy laws are coming. It’s likely that in the future, more users will use tools that protect their privacy. Big tech that prioritizes users (Apple, Mozilla) will get better at blocking trackers by big tech ad companies (Google, Meta)

This all means a bit less data for marketers.


A person with short, spiky hair smiles, wearing a blue shirt against a plain white background.
Marko Saric, Co-founder of Plausible Analytics

“GA4 is a bit of a mess. We frequently hear complaints about its user experience, privacy implications and surprisingly, its data accuracy. It is significantly impacted by cookie consent/GDPR banners, privacy-focused browsers and ad blockers. And the data modeling used to fill in the gaps caused by the missing data doesn’t seem to be that accurate either.”


What is GA4 data modeling?

The Analytics team at Google tries to fill in these gaps with data modeling based on machine learning, but this doesn’t work for everyone. You need to have consent mode turned, you need to have enough traffic and you need to set your “Reporting Identity” to Blended. Then it might work.

Even if it does, it will never know how many visitors are using AdBlock or in private browsing mode. This is Google making its best guess.

Google Analytics Reporting Identity settings page, showing options "Blended," "Device ID," and "Observed." The "Blended" option is highlighted with an info box suggesting it may fill in data gaps.

There’s another gotcha with Google Analytics guessing, according to friend and Analytics pro, Chris Penn.


A man with glasses is smiling in this black and white portrait photo.
Christopher Penn, co-founder of Trust Insights

“The problem is that not every audience is the same. If our data were missing at random, we could be assured that the guessing was more or less accurate. When data isn’t missing at random, then we run into problems.

For example, iPhone data is often missing due to Apple’s privacy protections. Are iPhone customers different from Android customers? You bet they are. They’re a different demographic with different purchase patterns. Is GA4 compensating for that? We don’t know. If a missing audience is assumed to behave the same as the existing audience, there could be disastrously wrong assumptions.”


What about GA4 consent mode?

Google has also launched Consent Mode V2 which is a method for having your consent management system tell GA4 that your visitor has granted or declined tracking. The idea is that if they decline to be tracked, Google will know you have a visitor, but track them just a little bit.

Ironic, right? Tell the tracker you don’t want to be tracked!

What about other sources of data?

Beyond GA4, there are other places to look for more accurate website data, such as your CDN or server logs. Server logs are the ultimate for accuracy because nothing can hide the fact that pages are being served. But they’re hard to check and don’t have great reporting. And because they don’t filter bot traffic the numbers might look very strange.

In this screenshot, Cloudflare shows 20x more users than GA4. How many bots are out there? This isn’t helpful…

Screenshot of analytics dashboard showing 85.8k unique visitors, 2.95M total requests, and 74.34% cache rate over a 30-day period with a note saying Cloudflare shows 20x more visitors than GA4.

In a separate analysis comparing GA4 to Matomo (an open source analytics package that runs on the server), Chris found that GA4’s traffic numbers were incorrect, but they were unpredictably incorrect. They had a variance between 49-173% of Matomo’s numbers that didn’t correlate with other sources of traffic.

So in theory, you could use this predictable variance as a modifier to Analytics data to calculate more accurate traffic stats. Compensating for GA4 inaccuracies.

In the end, none of these workarounds will ever give you perfect data. But is that really a problem?

What if you had perfect data?

Try this thought experiment: open GA4 and pretend for a moment that every number you see is 100% correct. Now proceed with your analysis.

Need ideas for analysis? Try answering these questions:

  • What are your best performing traffic sources? (instructions)
  • Which social networks send you the most engaged visitors? (instructions)
  • Which content has rising/falling traffic from search? (instructions)
  • Which email campaigns got the most engagement? (instructions)
  • Where did your last article perform best? (instructions)
  • How are visitors using your navigation? (instructions)
  • Which PPC landing pages have the best/worst performance for mobile visitors? (instructions)

All done? How did it go? Now ask yourself: Do you really think the insights you found were better because of the data accuracy? Is the lack of GA4 accuracy really holding back your marketing? Be honest.

In my experience, the problem with Google Analytics isn’t accuracy. It’s that marketers don’t approach it consistently, with curiosity and with an eye toward action.


A smiling person with short hair wearing a light blue collared shirt, pictured against a circular yellow background.
Luke Szkudlarek, Growth Strategy Lead at what. AG, Zurich

“Let’s stop talking about tools and start talking about data literacy, critical thinking and storytelling with data. Unfortunately, too few digital marketing professionals learn basic analysis and blindly trust digital analytics tools. Also the pressure from Google and Meta to spend more and from agencies profiting from big budgets creates a conflict of interest that isn’t in the interest of brands.

My advice is to take part of your media budget and invest in your data literacy. Then build a simple, consistent approach to data collection, analysis and interpretation. This could be based on GA4 and Search Console or any other software. But analytics is essential for businesses that invest in Google Ads or SEO. Therefore it’s a smart choice to get your data to work for your business.”


To get the most from your GA4 account, find those 10x performers and double down on those activities.

Find unicorns and make baby unicorns!

Flowchart titled "Using data to find the most impactful actions" showing steps: New Idea/Hypothesis, Try/Test/Measure, Is this working?, Is the impact big?, leading to either "Double down!" or new attempts.

Image source: Data-Driven Empathy: How to Use Data in Marketing

There is more where this came from…

The best content from this blog are available all in one place – our book. Now on it’s 7th edition.

Content Chemistry, The Illustrated Handbook for Content Marketing, is packed with practical tips, real-world examples, and expert insights. A must-read for anyone looking to build a content strategy that drives real business impact. Check out the reviews on Amazon.

Buy now direct $29.95

Book cover of "Content Chemistry" alongside a quote praising it as highly practical for modern digital marketing, attributed to Jay Baer, NYT best-selling author.